| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. NC Raiders 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 90% |
| 2. UWA 5 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 86% |
| 3. Harlies | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 52% |
| 4. Willetton Reds | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 48% |
| 5. Rockingham 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 10 | 48% |
| 6. Fremantle Cockburn 4 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 8 | 38% |
| 7. Kalamunda 2 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 | 33% |
| 8. Westside Wolves 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 7 | 33% |
| 9. Reds 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 5 | 24% |
| 10. WASPS 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 28 | -15 | 3 | 14% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.