| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Melville 8 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 86% |
| 2. UWA 8 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 17 | 81% |
| 3. Harlies 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 78% |
| 4. Hale 6 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 15 | 71% |
| 5. NC Raiders 4 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 21 | -8 | 8 | 38% |
| 6. Mods-OGM 7 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 7 | 33% |
| 7. YMCC 5 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 6 | 29% |
| 8. Joondalup Lakers 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 25 | -15 | 4 | 22% |
| 9. Reds 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 34 | -22 | 4 | 19% |
| 10. Lions 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 29 | -19 | 3 | 14% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.