| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Uni Associates 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 12 | 100% |
| 2. Melville 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 58% |
| 3. Uni Associates 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 58% |
| 4. YMCC 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 50% |
| 5. Hale 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 3 | 25% |
| 6. Fremantle Cockburn 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 | 0% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.